Centre for Disability Law & Policy. A member of the Institute for Lifecourse & Society. Peter Lambreghts, RIP. The Centre for Disability Law and Policy is deeply. Ivan\'s Jobs Blog is all about Jobs in Ireland, recruitemnt agencies, jobs sites, job posting, and job hunting in Ireland. There have been several episodes of The Simpsons that have a guess at foretelling the future, often with jokey implications. However, some of the predictions painted. Ty Bollinger’s Cancer(un)Truth, AKA: cancertruth. Over the past couple of months, we. This kind of name- calling is a well- documented trick of the trade, as anyone who has ever confronted a quack will know. For those of you who haven’t ever had the pleasure, this type of response is called an. In reality, it is the product of equating anything- goes conspiracy junk. But we’ll leave that aside.) As a sceptically- active adult who can usually smell bullshit before having read the first word on a webpage, it is very easy to get it into one. But this is a mistake. Harnessing the skill of detection takes practise and prior knowledge. It hurts me to imagine how many bright young minds, as we speak, are discovering Ty. Text- book biology is just what . Perhaps it’s because in reality, they function as a convenient conceptual framework for readers to place his.
It makes them easily remembered and spreadable. One thing’s for sure: when we see such selective inconsistency, we know the motivation is something other than truth. I will go through his answer to the question “What is Cancer?”, bit by bit. The entirety of his original text is quoted, but feel free to observe it in context at his website, via donotlink, here. Please note that I go into more depth on the kind of misinformation Bollinger spreads, and give an explanation of what cancer actually is (without assuming any prior knowledge), in this. Here is the first section of Ty’s piece on the question “What is Cancer?”“Conventional medicine defines cancer as a colony of malignant cells, or a tumor. If you have a tumor, then the conventional oncologist will try to. After they cut you, then they typically recommend chemo to try to kill any remaining cancer cells with. And they will finish off with radiation, to. What follows, this strongly suggests, is so reliant on unsubstantiated claims that he feels the need to poison the well by doubling- up on nasty words before he can let people read on, to inflame their emotions and make them less likely to go and do some fact- checking. The use of the snide expression, . Furthermore, look at the term . To be an oncologist, you have to have studied cancer genetics and cell biology and passed some long, hard exams. Practising oncology means treating patients on the basis of what you learned for those exams. And it implicitly makes one of the most fundamental oncological oversights, as seen in cancer quackery across the board: failing to distinguish between a benign tumour and a malignant tumour. A malignant tumour is one that contains cells which have gained the ability to break away from the tissue that holds them together. Before a tumour has started shedding cells into the blood lymphatic system, or . When possible, it is preferable to use surgery as the only treatment, because of the side- effects that are associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. However, unless there is good evidence that the tumour has not yet started to shed cells, it is often recommended that surgery is combined with other treatments, to give maximum confidence that all the cancer has been killed. If a patient is diagnosed with metastatic cancer, treatment must be tailored to the particular kind of cancer they have. This will be the result of careful analysis of the particular genetic traits of the cancer. At this point, I should say: cancer is NOT a disease, it is an remarkably diverse CATEGORY of disease. No two cancers are the same. Different tumours in the same body can have very different genetic profiles. In fact, even within the same tumour, cells may be different in this way. Likewise, chemotherapy isn. The drugs that are recommended as part of a patient. Radiation therapy works locally, targeting a specific area of the body, whereas chemotherapy and oral medication (Ty doesn. If money were no object, what kind of luxury accommodations could you afford? Start with these -- 10 of the most expensive hotel rooms in the world.Broadly speaking, these differences, combined with the patient. The cancer tumor is merely a symptom and the purpose of the alternative cancer treatment is to correct the root causes of cancer in the whole body.”So, after reiterating his fondness for loaded language, he tells a lie. In reality, the opposite is true. A one- dimensional, dumbed- down view of cancer, and the ignorant portrayal of the . Massive oversight number 2 from Ty Bollinger: the difference between proximate and ultimate causes, which, when it comes to cancer, is crucial. Please see paragraph 1 of the section entitled . The causes of cancer, both ultimate and proximate, are as diverse as cancer itself. The claim that “the cancer tumor is merely a symptom”, which is false, is discussed later.“The fact is we develop cancer cells throughout our bodies throughout our lives.”This is kind of true, but not really. Cells are called “cancer cells” when they. Cells do spontaneously mutate, and Ty is correct in saying that . The immune systems breakdown, and its cause, needs to be treated in conjunction with the cancer, in order to assure the best possible outcome for the patient. Here we see Ty’s complete ignorance of. We see it in all copying systems, not just in DNA- replication. Cancer can occur in people who are in very good physical shape. This doesn’t mean that the immune system has no role in cancer. But sometimes, even in a fully- functioning system, something slips through the net. Ty fails to mention hereditary cancer predispositions, some forms of which will result in a person getting cancer very early in life, and dying. Now, be prepared, this is where it all kicks off. Whether it be breast, prostate, renal or lung, there are many facets of their physiology that will remain constant. Taken in as a primary food? Yes, by all cells, including the healthy ones! Oh, and the whole of the next paragraph.“Knowing this, the wisdom of removing simple carbohydrates and sugars from the diet becomes obvious.? Even if his premise were correct, which it is not, this would still need to be supported by controlled studies.“It. And just because a cell has opiate receptors doesn. Cancer is made of tumour mass. If the tumour shrinks, the patient has less cancer. Tumours aren’t “symptoms” of an underlying disease, they are. Ty starts that paragraph by saying that something anyone who has ever studied cancer would dispute is undisputable. He then uses this as the basis for the idea that chemotherapy doesn. We are dealing with a seriously impaired thinker here, folks.) Let’s not forget that for this to be true would entail that every single oncological researcher, many of whom have come out of the best universities in the world, are willing to forfeit all semblance of scientific integrity for dirty pharma payouts. In principle, as someone who studied cancer as part of their degree, and who has friends in cancer research, I find this insulting. In practise, I had to get over that a long time ago when I realised that people like Ty are all over the place, and that taking offense doesn’t get you anywhere. Let’s avoid the false dichotomy that says you have to be in love with pharmaceutical companies to confront pseudoscience. In the words of Ben Goldacre, one of pharmaceutical companies’ most vocal critics (from his book. These business people often like to pretend, with an affectation of outside swagger, that their trade somehow challenges the pharmaceutical industry. In reality, they are cut from the same cloth, and simply use cruder versions of the same tricks, as I have written many times elsewhere. Problems in medicine do not mean that homeopathic sugar pills work; just because there are problems with aircraft design, that doesn’t mean that magic carpets really fly.”“Never confuse rapid tumor shrinkage with beating the cancer. Since the normal and healthy body response are CD- cells infiltration and consuming of cancer cells is also an inflammatory response, they are often confused by radiologists untrained in cancer fighting agents that work with the immune system to facilitate both increases in CD- cells and at the same time being cytotoxic (selectively killing cancer cells).”Here. As tumours grow and displace surrounding tissue, cells are damaged. Tumours also secrete a variety of substances which could act as harmful stimuli or irritants. A trained oncologist would never confuse inflammation for a tumour, let alone to the point where the patient would be referred for a PET scan. The two things look completely different. If on the off- chance such a rare error of judgement were. A biopsy, for example, would show unmistakably that the lump was not cancer. Inflammation is generalised fluid swelling, redness, and heat . In a PET scan, a radiologist is looking for areas where more energy is being expended – ie, where more glucose (from blood) is being demanded. No patient would ever be referred for a PET scan because of inflammation. Bollinger throws around the term “CD- cells”. The fact he seems to think that “CD- cells infiltration” is what the “inflammatory response is” demonstrates as clear as day that he he is using the term because he thinks it makes him sounds clever. That’s because there are a LOT of different types of CD cells. The CD number is the name given to a specific protein on the surface of a cell. Many CD cells (for example, CD4, CD8, CD2. It would have been good if Ty had read up on the topic he’s taken it upon himself to use as a basis for pushing his medical delusions on cancer sufferers. So, what would a radiologist *not* “untrained in cancer fighting agents that work with the immune system to facilitate both increases in CD- cells and at the same time being cytotoxic” look like? Well, on paper at least, they. And they’d have to believe that increasing CD cell- numbers was the holy grail of cancer treatment. The only thing CD cells necessarily share is that they are all involved the immune system. The immune system is mind- blowing in its degree of organisational complexity. Its many subsystems interact in an exquisitely specific manner and there is. In fact, sending someone’s whole immune system into overdrive would probably be a very, very bad idea.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
December 2016
Categories |